summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Content/posts/2023-03-17-future-of-writing.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Content/posts/2023-03-17-future-of-writing.md')
-rw-r--r--Content/posts/2023-03-17-future-of-writing.md5
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/Content/posts/2023-03-17-future-of-writing.md b/Content/posts/2023-03-17-future-of-writing.md
index 8a3584a..b77bac6 100644
--- a/Content/posts/2023-03-17-future-of-writing.md
+++ b/Content/posts/2023-03-17-future-of-writing.md
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
date: 2023-03-17 13:57
description: My thoughts on writing in the 21st century.
tags: ramblings, writing
+draft: true
---
# Future of Writing
@@ -17,7 +18,7 @@ able to recall anything with 100% guarantee.
So, the question arises, does it still make sense to put time and effort into writing blog posts?
You can simply ask an autoregressive model to generate it for you, based on bullet points.
-I feel like writitng still has a place in this world. Limitting ourselves to a model trained on a finite dataset, feels like an insult to creativity.
+I feel like writitng still has a place in this world. Limiting ourselves to a model trained on a finite dataset, feels like an insult to creativity.
If neural networks stopped being prediction machines, and were actually able to "think", I would still believe that creativity wins.
Even if that creativity was now coming from the machine.
@@ -27,4 +28,4 @@ As long as I am alive, and I have the spirit of being rebellious, I am never goi
Even if we have a tool that can generate the perfect essay, we humans will still write.
-Why? Just because we can. \ No newline at end of file
+Why? Just because we can.